upsticks: (Back Alley English)
[personal profile] upsticks
Moreover, especially in light of the pioneering nature of the discussion area, this means that the text becomes a mostly predictive venture, which while helpful, cannot be used as an analytical tool, unless by comparing what was thought to become with what did.


TENSE. OWIE.

(no subject)

16/11/09 12:44 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] sellars88.livejournal.com
That could make sense if I had a clue what you were talking about. It sounds good though.

(no subject)

21/11/09 17:37 (UTC)
ext_10830: Jewellrey (Ross Noble - Fizzy Logic stage bounce)
Posted by [identity profile] glitterfairy25.livejournal.com
I was talking about the predictions a 2001 book about the Internet had made. Even when you know that, it's still a bit *head boggly*

(no subject)

21/11/09 18:39 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] sellars88.livejournal.com
Not particularly the statement itself made perfect sense, but the context was confusing the crap out of me.

(no subject)

22/11/09 12:59 (UTC)
ext_10830: Jewellrey (Back Alley English)
Posted by [identity profile] glitterfairy25.livejournal.com
I realised that after I posted it - it's so horribly vague, eugh.

(no subject)

16/11/09 18:42 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] james0289.livejournal.com
Makes sense; I like it. :D
I've been reading a lot of scientific journals this week so I'm used to deciphering this kind of scientific mumbo-jumbo. :D

(no subject)

21/11/09 17:38 (UTC)
ext_10830: Jewellrey (Back Alley English)
Posted by [identity profile] glitterfairy25.livejournal.com
I...it does? :S

I swear, if scientific journals actually wrote in plainer English, they'd be so much shorter. Like, FIVE BOOKS shorter.

(no subject)

19/11/09 09:27 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] wsdante.livejournal.com

Trans: I have such an inflated opinion of my command of language, (albeit inaccurate), that it manifests itself in an inability to describe simple and self-evident concepts without resorting to the scribing of utter, long-winded bollocks.

ie: A prediction of what 'might' happen isn't good for any use other than to wait and see how accurate it was.

(no subject)

19/11/09 09:32 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] wsdante.livejournal.com
Sorry, G. There are times when you have to just 'step away from the books and keep your hands where you can see them'.

If you get hit with a fit like that again, go and do something that doesn't involve vocabulary for an hour or so; take a walk, go get a burger, anything.

The alternative means your ears might start bleeding :(

(no subject)

21/11/09 17:41 (UTC)
ext_10830: Jewellrey (Back Alley English)
Posted by [identity profile] glitterfairy25.livejournal.com
I hate this kind of language - the one that makes every thing so vague and necessarily complicated; it's just to make people look good and that style had totally gone to my head :/

I read some other dissertations instead, ones that sounded much smoother on the ears, and made sense too, so that was helpful. But yes, I completely agree. Academic reading can be so painful sometimes.

TBF, I was trying to discuss what somebody had said then about what now could be like, which is difficult to explain at any rate :S