![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Moreover, especially in light of the pioneering nature of the discussion area, this means that the text becomes a mostly predictive venture, which while helpful, cannot be used as an analytical tool, unless by comparing what was thought to become with what did.
TENSE. OWIE.
Tags:
(no subject)
16/11/09 12:44 (UTC)(no subject)
21/11/09 17:37 (UTC)(no subject)
21/11/09 18:39 (UTC)(no subject)
22/11/09 12:59 (UTC)(no subject)
16/11/09 18:42 (UTC)I've been reading a lot of scientific journals this week so I'm used to deciphering this kind of scientific mumbo-jumbo. :D
(no subject)
21/11/09 17:38 (UTC)I swear, if scientific journals actually wrote in plainer English, they'd be so much shorter. Like, FIVE BOOKS shorter.
(no subject)
19/11/09 09:27 (UTC)Trans: I have such an inflated opinion of my command of language, (albeit inaccurate), that it manifests itself in an inability to describe simple and self-evident concepts without resorting to the scribing of utter, long-winded bollocks.
ie: A prediction of what 'might' happen isn't good for any use other than to wait and see how accurate it was.
(no subject)
19/11/09 09:32 (UTC)If you get hit with a fit like that again, go and do something that doesn't involve vocabulary for an hour or so; take a walk, go get a burger, anything.
The alternative means your ears might start bleeding :(
(no subject)
21/11/09 17:41 (UTC)I read some other dissertations instead, ones that sounded much smoother on the ears, and made sense too, so that was helpful. But yes, I completely agree. Academic reading can be so painful sometimes.
TBF, I was trying to discuss what somebody had said then about what now could be like, which is difficult to explain at any rate :S